Enlightenment
can be understood as the advance of thought and has the goal of freeing human
beings from fear and inaugurate them as masters. That means the job of thinking
for oneself and employing and relying on one’s own intellectual capacities in
determining what to believe and how to act. Therefore Enlightenment scrutinizes
previously accepted doctrines and traditions because in order to use your own
understanding without the guidance of others you generally need to oppose to
the established beliefs.
The term myth
in the meaning of Adorno and Horkeimer’s argument can be seen as all forms of
knowledge that existed before enlightenment. It is superstitious, subjective
and emphasizes distinct individual experience over reproducible scientific
observation. The ability to represent but not embody is essential to mythic
practice. Although something like older rituals, religions and philosophies,
which are acknowledged as mythical and outdated by the forces of
secularization, Adorno and Horkheimer argues that they may still have
contributed to the process of enlightenment.
Adorno and
Horkheimer mentions some different media such as radio, film, magazines and
television but my interpretation is that the “old” and “new” media is referring
to the change in culture that has happened due to the introduction of the
culture industry. The authors talks much about art and to me it seems as if
Adorno and Horkheimer tries to argument that art is a contrast to what the
culture industry stands for. An interesting quote is “Films and radio no longer
need to present themselves as art. The truth that they are nothing but business
is used as an ideology to legitimize the trash they intentionally produce”. My
take on this is that before the culture industry, art was the popular media but
now through the standardization of culture, mass culture is the “new” admired media.
The culture
industry is the factory of mass cultural institutions which produces
standardized cultural goods for the masses. This culture industry involves
standardization, repetition and efficiency and manipulates the society into
passivity. According to Adorno and Horkheimer the productions made by the
culture industry robs people of their imagination and takes over their
thinking. The products are designed to deny imagination, spontaneity, fantasy
and any active thinking of the spectators. The culture
industry creates a mass production where everything is homogenized and
diversity only consists of small trivialities. A good quote from the text that
describes this is “every film is a preview of the next”. Here you can see the
authors clear opinion of standardization in the culture industry.
According
to Adorno and Horkheimer the mass media, or culture industry, gives the
illusion of being informed and involved, but in reality the consumer is being
reduced to minding himself with his own unimportant troubles. The consumer of
mass media is certain that the media is adapted to his needs while in fact the
culture industry produces this sentiment in order to strengthen its influence.
Thus the consumers of mass media are being deceived and a “mass deception” is
taking place.
In the
fourth chapter Adorno and Horkheimer are talking a lot about the term amusement
in relation to the culture industry. Amusement existed long before the industry
itself. An interesting thing they say about amusement is that according to
them, amusement means putting things out of mind and forgetting suffering. The
escape is not from bad reality though, but from the last thought of resisting
that reality. The liberation which amusement promises is from thinking as
negation. I thought this description of amusement was appealing because this is
in some way how I look at amusement, especially when it comes to film. For me,
I think it’s a difference between watching films on the television or going to
the cinema though. If you go to the cinema this description of amusement is
more correct in my opinion that when you watch on the television, because when
you go to the cinema it is more of a special occasion and because of the environment
of the darkness and sharing of experience with the rest of the audience you can
just forget about your life outside the cinema.
Your reflection about amusement made me think of a passage in this book where the authors talked about how a housewife that escapes from her reality by going to the movie theater and watching a film. The way they described this notion really stood out to me, and it was like they wanted to say that this housewife was escaping from her duties towards her home and family. I wonder what they would say about all the facebook'ing and other things we waste time on today neglecting our duties whilst amusing ourselves with simple pleasures of the culture industry...
SvaraRaderaYeah i remember that passage and i think i hade it a bit in my mind aswell when i wrote my reflection. Interesting comparison with facebooking and such, makes me think that maybe what Adorno and Horkheimer are describing is an old form of procrastination. In that case i'm glad that the procrastination is easier now, you don't need to go to the cinema, instead you just do something else at the computer like facebooking or maybe cleaning your appartment.
Radera