My paper
I chose a
paper from the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, which has an impact
factor of 1.778. The paper is called The
Role of Social Network Sites in Romantic Relationships: Effects on Jealousy and
Relationship Happiness (Beukeboom & Utz, 2011). The paper investigates
how the use of social networking sites (SNSs) affects romantic relationships in
terms of jealousy and happiness. The conclusions were that people in general
experienced more happiness than jealousy in reaction to the partner’s
activities on SNSs. Individuals with low self-esteem experience more jealousy
than people with high self-esteem. These two groups did not differ in the
experienced SNS happiness.
The
quantitative method that they have used in this paper is an online survey which
has been held among all students following a course on interpersonal
communication at a Dutch university. The survey contained various personality
measures and questions on SNS use. 194 people in total completed the survey (56
males and 138 females) which 103 of those were involved in a relationship and
thus were the important subjects. The mean age of the participants was 22 years
and the mean relationship duration was 25.75 months.
One
strength in their method is that they have used a whole class which consists of
both very active and less active SNS users. As they states in the paper, other
forms of recruitment of subjects, for example via SNSs may lead to a
self-reflected sample in which there are an overrepresentation of highly active
users.
Since the
paper was made by students the benefits of using an online survey are that you
can get it out quickly to a lot of subjects. It is also a low cost method and
it takes little time effort to carry out which is often important in school.
The limitations are usually the possibility of only attracting certain kinds of
people; those that are very interested in the product/research area and thus
willing to participate. This they had solved though with their method for
recruiting subjects. Since they chose students though, the age is limited to the
age group that probably uses SNSs the most. Questions with fixed answers, as
they had, may also not describe the situation for the subjects in the best
possible way.
As the
authors stated in the paper, all the measures were self-report measures and
therefore the results could have been influenced by social desirability. Also
the sub groups that used various SNSs were too small to systematically compare
users from different SNSs. To get a more generalized idea of the situation, the
survey could have been sent out to students in more than just one course or
maybe to another forum like an evening cooking class where the age range is
rather different.
“Physical activity, stress and self-reported
upper respiratory tract infection”
More
infections during the winter than in the spring are a no-brainer. It was
interesting to see though that if you are highly stressed, physical activity
has a greater effect on preventing URTI, than if you have a low level of
stress. They made good use of quantitative research to get a generalized
picture of how physical activity affects the risks of getting URTI. When making
this investigation in how something affects something else I think it’s very
good to use a quantitative method because then you want to get greater accuracy.
Benefits and limitations of quantitative
methods
The
quantitative research allows you to do a broader study which involves a greater
number of subjects. In quantitative methods you get vast sources of information
which allows for greater objectivity and accuracy and you can make comparisons
across categories and/or over time. The limitations are that you can miss
contextual details and the results are limited in that sense that they provide
numerical descriptions rather than detailed narrative as well as providing less
elaborate accounts of human perception.
Benefits and limitations of qualitative methods
The
benefits of qualitative methods are that you obtain a more realistic view that
can’t be understood by numerical data and issues can be examined more in detail
and in depth. It also provides for direct interaction with the research
subjects. The ways of collecting the data are also more flexible since the
framework for it can change during the execution. The limitations are that the
findings are harder to visualize, it can be easy to drift away from the
original objectives of the research and the researcher’s presence during data
gathering can affect the subject’s responses.
References
Beukebom,
J, C. & Utz, S. (2011). The Role of Social Network Sites in Romantic
Relationships: Effects on Jealousy and Relationship Happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Volume
16, Issue 4, pages 511–527, July 2011.
Fondell, E., Lagerros, Y. T., Sundberg, C. J., Lekander, M.,
Bälter, O., Rothman, K., & Bälter, K. (2010). Physical activity, stress,
and self-reported upper respiratory tract infection. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 43(2), 272-279.
Hi Filip!
SvaraRaderaYou have chosen a very interesting quantitative paper, which made me curious to read. The survey was sent out to 194 people where only 56 of them where male. In my opinion this can be a disadvantage though the genders are not equally represented. If the aim of the study is to see how people act in relationships, shouldn’t they choose participants who are in a relationship? 91 of the participants where single people. Maybe there knowledge from previous relationships was interesting? Many questions here. But it was good written blog text where you summarize the study in a very short and informative way.